New Delhi: A shoe was thrown at Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud during a Supreme Court hearing on October 4, prompting widespread outrage and scrutiny of right-wing YouTuber Ajeet Bharti. The attacker, identified as a lawyer named Shubham, was detained by authorities shortly after the incident.
Bharti, who runs the YouTube channel “Kooch,” is being criticised online for his frequent attacks on the judiciary. Several users resurfaced his past videos, accusing him of spreading hate and mocking judges. One of his earlier clips allegedly ridicules members of the bench and calls for their public shaming.
Legal experts and citizens have expressed concern over the growing influence of online figures who undermine respect for constitutional institutions. They warned that repeated verbal hostility toward judges encourages contempt and hostility among followers.
While Bharti’s supporters claim he exercises his right to free expression, critics argue his rhetoric has crossed ethical lines. The Supreme Court Bar Association and other legal groups have urged action against content that disrespects judicial independence.
Authorities are reportedly investigating whether Bharti’s videos played a role in motivating the attacker. The incident has reignited debate on the responsibility of digital creators and the thin line between criticism and incitement.
