NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has refused to quash the First Information Report (FIR) lodged against folk singer Neha Singh Rathore over her social media post related to the Pahalgam terror attack, stating that the matter involves factual questions requiring investigation.
A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta heard Rathore’s plea seeking to nullify the FIR, which accuses her of making objectionable remarks concerning the terror incident in Jammu and Kashmir. The Court observed that interfering at this stage would be premature since the issues raised in the complaint demand factual examination by investigating authorities.
Rathore, known for her politically charged songs and commentary, had shared a post allegedly questioning the government’s handling of the Pahalgam attack and the effectiveness of the security apparatus. The FIR, filed under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, reportedly includes charges linked to promoting enmity and public mischief.
Defending her post, Rathore argued that her remarks were satirical and intended to raise awareness rather than incite hostility. She described the FIR as an attempt to suppress dissent and artistic freedom.
The case has reignited debate over the balance between free speech and national security. Legal observers say the Court’s decision underscores that investigative processes must run their course when factual disputes are present, regardless of claims of artistic expression.
