Bengaluru: While hundreds of displaced families in north Bengaluru continue to await permanent rehabilitation, the Karnataka government’s decision to allot prime urban land to religious institutions has triggered debate over land-use priorities, social equity, and legal compliance.
The controversy centres on the allotment of nearly 20 acres of government land in Bengaluru North Taluk to 22 backward-class mathas during the tenure of Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda. The move has drawn criticism as families from Kogilu village, displaced by major infrastructure and development projects, remain without adequate housing despite repeated assurances from the state.
Official records show the proposal was cleared by the Revenue Department after vetting by the Legal and Finance Departments, with the government asserting that existing rules were followed. Critics, however, argue the decision contradicts judicial restrictions on the diversion of gomala (grazing) land and undermines commitments to rehabilitate displaced communities.
The allotted land is spread across villages such as Dasanapura and Ruvatanahalli in north Bengaluru. About 8.78 acres are located in Dasanapura, while another 40.16 acres lie in Ruvatanahalli, areas undergoing rapid urbanisation. Officials estimate that once converted to non-agricultural use, the land could be valued between ₹236 crore and ₹297 crore.
Despite this potential value, the government reportedly charged only the prevailing non-agricultural land price, raising concerns about possible revenue loss. The land is to be transferred as free grants or at concessional rates to promote religious, cultural, and social activities. The government maintains that mathas serving backward classes contribute to social upliftment.
Legal experts have flagged concerns over Supreme Court and High Court rulings restricting diversion of gomala land for non-public purposes. While officials insist the parcels were non-gomala or legally converted, activists argue some plots were originally grazing land, violating judicial directives.
The issue has gained urgency due to the plight of Kogilu residents, displaced by road expansion and urban development. Many families continue to live in precarious conditions while awaiting alternative land or housing, despite repeated representations.
Defending the decision, officials said due process was followed and approvals obtained, including from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, arguing the allotment aligns with social justice goals.
The episode has reignited debate on urban land governance in Bengaluru, where rapid expansion has intensified competition over scarce land. For displaced families, the debate remains academic without concrete rehabilitation on the ground. Urban planners warn that prioritising equitable housing is essential to ensure inclusive development and long-term social stability.
