New Delhi: The Lok Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill early Thursday morning after an intense 12-hour debate, with 288 votes in favor and 232 against. The bill, which will now move to the Rajya Sabha, seeks to amend the 1995 law governing Waqf properties, introducing key changes that have sparked controversy, reported the NDTV.
One of the most contentious provisions is the mandatory inclusion of two non-Muslim members in the Central Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards. Additionally, only individuals who have practiced Islam for at least five years will be eligible to donate properties to Waqf. The bill also stipulates that government property identified as Waqf will be reassessed by the local Collector, who will determine its ownership.
The Opposition strongly opposed the bill, arguing that the Joint Parliamentary Committee had ignored their suggestions. Congress leaders accused the government of attempting to “defame and disenfranchise minorities,” while AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi staged a symbolic protest, tearing up a copy of the bill in a dramatic gesture reminiscent of Mahatma Gandhi’s defiance of British laws.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah defended the bill, alleging that Waqf properties had been acquired through irregular means, including land belonging to temples and government institutions. He cited several instances, including properties in Delhi’s Lutyens’ zone and Tamil Nadu, where he claimed Waqf ownership was improperly established. He emphasized that the amendments would ensure transparency and prevent misuse of properties.
Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi countered these claims, labeling the bill an “assault on the Constitution” and a deliberate attempt to polarize society. Shiromani Akali Dal MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal also criticized the government, questioning its motives behind introducing the bill.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has announced plans to challenge the bill in court and mobilize nationwide protests similar to the farmers’ movement. Spokesperson Mohammad Mohsin stated that the board would take all peaceful measures, including road blockades, to oppose the legislation.
